|
My Trip to Amsterdam, Paris,
and Helsinki
|
|
Amsterdam Page
|
|
May 21 - May24, May 28
- May 29, 2003
|
On Eiffel Tower
My first stop is
Amsterdam. The plan was to fly to Amsterdam, stay for two nights, take
the Thaly's train to Paris and stay for three nights. After that,
I had planned to take the Thaly's train to Cologne to visit an old
friend for one night. Then I was going to take the train again to
go back to Amsterdam, stay for one night before flying to Helsinki.
I
would then stay in Helsinki for 3 nights before taking the Silja line
to
go to Stockholm. In the end, because of some unforeseen
circumstances, I skipped Cologne and Stockholm, stayed for an
additional night in Helsinki and Paris.
Overall, it's a great trip! However, Amsterdam turned out to
be a bad start. It was early in the morning at around 6am that we
landed. It was foggy and it was raining. I could hardly see
anything out of the window and suddenly we had already landed. I
complained about the weather and the KLM air stewardess makes a gesture
that said "Well, welcome to Amsterdam, what do you expect?" This
was the first time I flew with KLM. I like them because their
fare was the cheapest. Their service attitude is at times
adequate and
at times very tactless. On my return flight from Amsterdam, they
were serving some chocolate bars and pretzel things after the meal.
An old woman took two, the air stewardess didn't hesitate one
second in telling her off, "Ma'am, I am sorry, you can only take one."
How much does
a tiny bag of pretzel cost? Perhaps she got it right afterall,
when
you fly cheap, one bag of pretzel contributes significantly to the
marginal cost! And I noticed their uniforms. They are
functional and
that's it. Somehow it reminded me of that picture on the label of
the Dutch lady's milk. In any case, I started to understand why
my friend E always got very excited with Singapore Airline. Well,
not SIA in general but you know what I mean in reference to what I just
said. But I will fly with KLM again because I am cost conscious -
a euphemism for being cheap.
Enough digression. Back to Amsterdam where it all
started. The rain went on for two days straight until I left
for Paris. It was quite depressing really. All the sunny pictures
posted here were taken later, after my return from Paris. The
pictures were too depressing to be shown. Now I understand why
my friend J was always so happy and cheerful in his email when he
exclaimed
that the sun was out. In singapore or Malaysia, I am generally
happier
when the sun is not out, esp when I don't need to travel in the rain
and
just stay in my office.
People in the
tourist service industry in Amsterdam -- like the train
counters and the tourist info place -- were quite unfriendly and
sarcastic. I suspect that it has got to do with being asked the
same questions every day. But the most unpleasant experience in
Amsterdam was my encounter with some fake police on my first day near
the Rijksmuseum. Long story I won't recount. Suffice to say
it's unpleasant, esp when I was lost and exhausted from my long flight.
Luckily as far as I can tell, I didn't lose anything as I
suggested to them that we went to a police station and they left me
quickly. It happened so fast when I was so lost that even in
retrospect I wasn't quite sure about what happened. In any case,
I found that whenever I let my guard down I generally ran into
problems. I have to be constantly on my guard. Never chat
with strangers if they approached you first. But this of course
presents a dilemma. If everybody applies this rule, there will be
no contact between strangers. But I guess it is necessary as in
any big city swarming with tourists, there almost always exists an
industry that lives off the dumb tourists. And as my friend J
said quite simply, I dressed like a f****** tourist, with the fleece
jacket, the camera, and the backpack, except that I didn't wear the
track pant. Note to self: improve my fashion sense before the
fashion police gets me.
Note: since I posted this, a number of people have asked me about my
"run in with the law." So I have recounted the story and put it
in a footnote (*) at the end of this page. Enjoy!
One
might think that Amsterdam is exceedingly seedy and filthy.
Afterall, this is a place that legalizes prostitution, tolerates
alternative lifestyles, and allows smoking of marijuana in the
coffeeshops. But the place is surprisingly clean. It's
comparable to Singapore. The same goes for Paris. Except
for some graffitti, I find it to be very clean. Well, except the
occasional dog shits which
turns out to be less than I have imagined. I was up early one
sunday
and saw saw this green car cleaning the dog shits on the street.
Perhaps I didn't see the real Paris and Amsterdam, or perhaps
there are more than one means to an end?
As far as food is concerned, I don't remember much except that I had a
sandwich with J in a funky place. The sandwich
was called "full moon." Hmm.. I also had this thing with
herring and pickles wrapped in the buns, called broodje I think.
It doesn't taste bad. I could eat it. It could even
taste alright in the hot summer. But the raw herring has a very
strange texture, it feels almost like chewing on cotton. I had
more encounter with herring in Finland at the conference. I never
had the chance to carry out the authenticity experiment to the "famous"
dutch pea
soup though; to stick a spoon into the soup and see if it falls down
slowly.
Sometime ago I read this book called "Cultural Shock: Holland" or
something sounds like that. I read that the traditional dutch
will generally not close the curtains on the windows. The idea is
that of costly signalling. If you open the curtains on the
windows, you signal to people that you are a hardworking housewife and
you have kept your house sparklingly clean. So the curtains are
open because you are not afraid of close inspection. On the other
hand, if you
keep the curtains closed, then you signal to people that you are lazy
and
your house is probably not clean. As I said, it's costly
signalling.
It's costly because by keeping the curtains opened, you sacrifice
on some privacy. It's merely signalling because I suspect nobody
will necessarily go up to inspect how clean your house is.
Anyway, I mentioned this to a dutch conference participant P from
Rotterdam. He told me that there is no such thing and he kept his
curtains closed! There are three possibilities. I will
leave it to your imagination. P, if you are reading this, I am
just kidding about one of the possibilities.
I saw no windmills and no tulips in Amsterdam. But I did see
tulips in Helsinki. Weird, huh? I also saw
no windmills in Amsterdam though I already knew that before I went.
The
Centraal station on a sunny day, taken when I came back to Amsterdam
from Paris to fly to Helsinki.
I
met up with J, an old friend I knew from berkeley and have kept in
touch for 3 years (not because I knew one day I will go to Amsterdam
and bother him). This is one of the more "normal" pictures we
took that day. He is a teeny bit out of control! I have
forgotten about that after three years! He actually took the time
to show me some not so typical sides of Amsterdam. And I sat on
the back of his bike all day. I think both his legs and his bike
have
taken great toll that day. I am grateful.
I
made the mistake of drinking a cup of cuppuccino with him at 3pm in the
afternoon. I didn't have a wink that night. I should
remember never to drink any coffee. It always happens.
Well,
what do you know? A canal in Amsterdam. What a surprise!
The
royal palace, very modest from what I have seen in Paris.
Apparently a queen ran back to Paris because she thought that the
palace was
not fit for a queen, not least because of the stench from the canals.
But you shouldn't trust me on this. Do your own homework.
The
Van Gogh museum. I liked it here. Saw many famous paintings
known through the postcards. One curious thing I find with the
museums in Amsterdam and Paris is that they always have some sort of
lockers to store your bags. You need to put in some coins before
you can use it. But the coins are always returned to you when you
retrieve
your bags later. You can argue that you were never charged for
the
service, which is interesting. But of course, you can argue that
the service has already been included in the admission ticket. I
seem
to remember that the Louvre is free for the unemployed. I don't
think
you will have the mood to go to the museum if you are unemployed in
Singapore.
Looking
out from the Van Gogh musuem. You see the Rijksmuseum in
the middle left. All the museums are close to each other in the
museum quarter.
The
whole town seems to be out in the cafes on a sunny afternoon. This is
how I would like to remember Amsterdam. But the dutch smoke way
too much, even indoor. The cafes indoor feel like a gas chamber
to me. Too much second hand smoke and it could kill too. These
cafes are located at Leidseplein. It is at least as lively as
Rembrandtplein. A bit further from here is the Museum quarter.
If I remember correctly, tram number 2 and 5 take you here.
|
|
My
hotel for the first two nights is right at Prinsengracht, next to tram
line no 4 that goes through Utrechtsestraat. It's nice and quiet.
Not as crazy as Rembrandtplein, where I stayed when I came back
from Paris. This place on Prinsengracht is more like a Bed and
Breakfast place for honeymooners really. The room is surprisingly
big. It comes with very typical narrow staircase. Shown
above is Prinsengracht taken on the day I checked out of my hotel and
prepared to leave for the Centraal station to go to Paris. I
couldn't open the front door with my key on first trial and had to ring
up the owner. The owner said that for some unknown reasons,
Asians typically have more problems opening his door with the key.
I felt sorry that I reinforced that stereotype.
My
hotel at after I came back from Paris. This hotel is right at the
Rembrandt square. It's very clean (even the shared bathroom and
toilet
are really clean) but it is really noisy that night. I didn't get
any sleep. Some people started honking their horns a few times
in the night, at around 1am, 3am, and 5am. Once started, others joined
in. It's unbearable. I don't know if it has anything to do
with the religious holiday that fell on May 29 (which makes it a unique
event) or people werejust stoned and happy (which makes it a recurring
event).
A
dutch drawbridge. I
was too exhausted, having just arrived and too depressed from the
nonstop rain to investigate closely. I am not sure if this is the
famous Magere Brug. It looks too small to be the one.
Flower
market next to a canal, taken on the morning I left for Helsinki.
The
Rijksmuseum. Unfortunately they closed down the entire painting
section 'coz they found asbestos in the building. So no Rembrandt
or Vermeer for me, not that I know how to appreciate them. When I
was in the Louvre in Paris, there are signs everywhere pointing to Mona
Lisa. Although there are clear signs barring flash photography,
almost nobody cares. I felt bad for Mona Lisa.
Singapore
has really tough law
on marijuana use. It's scary. We are punishable in jail
terms even if the actual consumption is elsewhere outside Singapore.
I was appalled to read the following story when I was in
Berkeley. Needless to say, no space cake or marijuana for me
while in Amsterdam,
even though it is legal to consume them in the coffeeshops in Amsterdam.
Read the story
here...
One curious
thing I observed on the subway and trams in Amsterdam and Paris is that
there is always a button or a lever on the door that you need to press
or lift in order to get in or out. But in Singapore the door is
controlled centrally by the bus driver. I wonder why. I
don't imagine the metro in Paris is less busy than the MRT in
Singapore. Why not open all
the doors at every station? What is the reason behind this
design.
The bus in California requires the riders to push a bar to open
the door to get out of the bus, but it doesn't allow people to open the
door from the outside. In the case of the US, this design, as I
understand
it, is to prevent the free riders from entering the bus from behind.
But
what is the purpose of this design in Amsterdam and Paris?
The metro in
Paris is designed to prevent people from jumping over the entrance.
Yet no such device exists in Singapore. One could end up
reading too much into
this, admittedly...
|
* I was walking near
the Rijksmuseum looking for the entrance. Then this guy walking
by sort of started to make a conversation. Then he asked me where
I am from, blah blah blah... I normally just ignore these
people. But I was in an unusual chatty mood that day, being happy
to be on vacation and a little depressed at the same time because I
couldn't get a friend whom I was hoping to see in Amsterdam on the
phone since I arrived and I will only spend another day in
Amsterdam. So I answer the questions that I thought were
harmless. Partly also because I thought he was also
on vacation looking for the entrance to the museum and thought no harm
if
I can get help from another fellow traveller (he said that he was a
tourist from italy and just arrived. If I were smart, I should
have suspected at this point but I didn't). We were walking round
the Rijksmuseum looking for the entrance and then he casually asked me
what was the exchange rate between Malaysian ringgits and the
euros. As soon as he asked this
question, two guys in plain clothes jumped out from nowhere and shouted
"police
check!" and asked to see my passport and my money. They asked if
I
was with the other guy. They said that they were trying to catch
chinese
people exchanging money illegally on the street (?). I was of
course
suspicious. So the first thing I did was to ask to see the
ID.
They showed me a laminated card with some info. As I have not
seen
a real police ID in Amsterdam, I really have no idea how a real police
ID
is supposed to look like. I didn't want to appear like I am
escaping
from police investigation in case if these guys were real. I was
quite
exhausted and lost at the time, after having flown for close to
thirteen
hours (arrived in Amsterdam at 6am and this was about 2pm). I did
show
them my passport. When I show them my passport, I revealed my
money
belt as my passport was in my money belt and they got closer and they
touched
the money in my money belt with their fingers (I didn't remove my money
belt
or take the money out of my money belt). But I was still very
suspicious
at this point and I protested that checking my money was irrelevant and
I
said we should go down to a police station and not do this on the
street.
I don't recall everything clearly now as I was in shock and really
tired.
But as far as I can remember, shortly after I made that suggestion,
they
let me go. They were like, "you go this way, the other guy go
that
way. Don't walk together." I was lucky because as far as I
can
tell, I didn't lose anything. All my valuables (credit cards,
cash,
wallet, cameras) are still with me (unless I lost something and still
haven't
realize it).
The reasons I think they are fake are, first because the timing was so
precise: as soon as that guy asked about the exchange rate, these two
guys jumped out from nowhere. Second, they leave me alone when I
suggested going to a police station. Third, my friend in
Amsterdam told me that they must be fake and nobody else has
encountered something like this. Fourth, when I arrived at the
Central station, I recalled seeing a warning about people posing as
police (which I mistakenly didn't read because I was carrying such a
huge bag and really exhausted from my trip and thought that I am savvy
enough to avoid a run in with these scams). In retrospect, these
three guys must be in it together. One guy will try to make
conversation with someone who looks like a tourist and the other two
will pose as police. And they will steal or swap the money when
the tourist was confused with the situation. And I suspect they
pick Japanese and chinese as targets for obvious reason.
Actually there is one fishy bit related to this unpleasant event that I
haven't
told you yet. Before I ran into these guys, I have already walked
around
the museum building a bit looking for the entrance. But I haven't
found
it. Then I saw a guy smoking a cigarette next to a museum shop
next
to the fountain. From the look of it, he worked in the museum
shop.
So I figured he must know where the entrance is. So I went
and
asked him. He was helpful but gave me the wrong direction and
sent
me to the opposite side of where the actual entrance was (when the
entrance
was maybe 20 to 30 meters in front of the museum shop, slightly to the
left!).
And I ran into these guys when I went to check out the wrong side
of
the buildings. Puzzle: granted, the museum closed down the
paintings
section of the museum because asbestos were found there and the layout
may
have changed a little as a consequence, but how can a guy who hang
around
the Rijksmuseum not know the entrance to the museum (even assuming that
he
doesn't work in the museum shop)? Is he in it together with the
gang?
I still don't know the answers. Perhaps he was genuinely
helpful
and the entrance was really on the other side of the buildings before
the
partial shut down of the museum. I never know.
Since I am on this subject, I will share another fishy thing that
happened to me in Paris. I was at the Louvre. There were a
few guys hanging around the compound outside. I was going to the
entrance. One of them approached me, handed me a piece of paper
and told me that they were asking people to sign against landmines in
Cambodia etc. My impression was that it was a petition and it was
a good cause too. Afterall, you lose nothing in signing. So
I signed. After I signed, I then
noticed that there was a column at the end that said "donation."
By this time, it's a bit late to get out of it since I have
signed. There were some signatures before me with 20 euros
donation (but it's really irrelevant if this were a scam).
Alerted at the dishonest tactics they used, I just wanted to get
out of there and so I put down 5 euros. Then that guy said
something that aroused my suspicion further: he said that the minimum
donation is 20 euros! At this point, it just sounded like an
extortion to me. So I insisted that I didn't have that much
money. Finally he said ok. In the end, I still couldn't be
certain if this was a scam. But three things aroused my
suspicions: first, it happened at the
Louvre. At popular tourist attractions, there is often a group of
people who live off unwary tourists. Second, that guy wasn't
honest enough to say outright that he was looking for donation but
disguised it (intentionally I gather) as a petition. Third, the
minimum donation thing just sounded ridiculous to me.
I have decided that I am no match to these guys whose profession is to
scam people. There are so many ways to trick you into something.
They can be so subtle that you cannot realize it from the
beginning. And they are really good in manipulating people's
psychology: people's trust of the police, people's desire to save face
and appear to be good caring persons
etc. Heck, one famous experiment even shows that people are
willing
to inflict considerable pains to the others if told by someone who
dressed
like a authority figure said it's ok.
In any case, I am no match to these guys. So in the future I am
just going to try hard to avoid them. Perhaps not dressing like a
f****** tourist would help. But being a first time traveller in a
foreign
country, it is hard not to dress like a f****** tourist and bring all
the
gear (maps, cameras, water bottles) with you.