Flow
over regular roughness
Objectives
To measure vertical and horizontal structure of turbulence statistics for various roughness densities in a wind tunnel.
Methodology
| The thermally-stratified
open-circuit blower boundary-layer wind tunnel at the Research Institute
for Applied Mechanics (RIAM) at Kyushu University, Japan
was used to measure turbulent flow over a rough model
surface (neutral conditions only). The dimensions of the
wind tunnel are 1.5 x 1.2 x 13.5 m (W x H x L).
Boundary-layers were developed over 4 different arrays of
cube-roughness (30 x 30 x 30 mm) with linearly increasing
roughness density. Boundary-layer height varied between
180 - 300 mm. The photograph on the right is a view towards the wind tunnel intake of the roughness configuration termed E-type which is the highest roughness density used in this experiment. |
![]() |
Preliminary Results
Analysis of observations is still incomplete - please write to the NUS administration and suggest to reduce my administrative workload and teaching duties if you think this work should be expedited. The results below show the strong variability of the flow over a rough surface. Here C- and E-type cases are both from staggered (diamond-shaped) roughness arrays with E-type having the larger roughness density.
The panel on the right shows mean vertical wind velocity (in cm/s) from traverses (y-direction) measured at 5 heights (h = height of roughness element) at various locations along the normalized transverse axis (d = distance between cubes). The thick blue bars show the location of the cubes relative to the measurement: solid (dashed) line refer to measurements behind (ahead) of a cube). Below h, W is generally negative behind and between cubes but strongly positive just ahead of an obstacle. |
The panel on the left shows standard deviations of u normalized by the constant flux layer friction velocity as a function of non-dimensional height. Also indicated are data from 2 urban studies (Z86 and S92) and measurements from a wind tunnel study performed by M. Raupach and co-workers (Reference). |