The neglected king: The customer in the
new knowledge ecology of innovation
Gernot Grabher I Professor of Economic
Geography I
Socio-Economics of Space <http://www.giub.uni-bonn.de/grabher/>
I University of Bonn, Germany
Email <grabher@giub.uni-bonn.de>
ÔThe customer is kingÕ, of course. Despite
this universal mantra, the role of the customer so far seemed confined to a
passive recipient of products at the terminus of the value chain. More
recently, however, this traditional perception has been challenged. On the one
hand, users are increasingly appreciated as reflexive actors who are actively
involved in the evaluation, modification and configuration of products. In
fields like software, computer-games or sports equipment, for example, users
are even ascribed entrepreneurial and innovative functions. On the other hand,
firms are seeking to tap into new pools of knowledge in their relentless search
for new sources of innovation. Beyond the established repertoire to access
external knowledge through alliances and collaborative arrangements with
R&D-institutions, firms increasingly attempt to harness user knowledge.
These two concurrent shifts, however, do not result in a smooth convergence.
Rather they open up a highly contested terrain on which habitual distinctions
between producer and user are blurred.
The prime aim of this paper is to map out
the evolving terrain of user-producer interaction in innovation processes. More
specifically, I will firstly contrast more traditional approaches to
incorporate customer knowledge with an emerging class of innovative
user-producer relationships, provisionally dubbed Ôco-developmentÕ. This
preliminary term is intended to denote three key features: an increasing role
of hybrid communities that involve unconventional combinations of experts and
laymen; a re-distribution of power between users and producers; and novel modes
of sharing knowledge and exerting control afforded by social software.
Secondly, I propose a typology of different modes of co-development that is
organized along two dimensions. The first dimension indicates the degree of
user-involvement and stretches from producer-initiated consultation to
user-initiated generation of knowledge. The second dimension differentiates
between deliberate knowledge production in epistemic communities on the one
hand and knowledge production as a by-product of practicing communities, on the
other. The resulting typology seeks to capture the heterogeneity of co-development
approaches and to provide a conceptual template for further empirical research
into user-involvement in innovation. Finally, I will speculate about some wider
implications of co-development practices for theorizing social and spatial
dynamics of knowledge production in economic geography.
This paper is based on the research
project ÔCo-development in hybrid communitiesÕ sponsored by the German Research
Foundation (DFG).